I know I've been out of it with console games lately, but I still have some interest in Goldeneye Wii.

It depends on reviews, of course, the length of the game, and how the online is. I never really tried online with the Wii but I wouldn't mind giving it my first run if I did get the game.

I'm also going to skip the golden controller. I don't want to spend $70 for this especially when I already have a black classic controller, one from Monster Hunter Tri.

Anyway, what about you guys? Are you guys planning to get this? If so, are you planning to have a VG Press online match-up or something? I'm thinking about getting it, but I still haven't decided.

After reading the interview with the lead developer of the game, absolutely not.  I put the interview in the Goldeneye thread.

I will get it eventually, just not at launch.

When it's $10 maybe.

I'm kind of surprised at the replies. I thought most of us here would be interested in this game. I guess maybe it's because we don't really trust Eurocom yet, which I can understand. That's why I'm going to see what reviews and other impressions say about the game.

It looks promising

gamingeek said:

You should be using the Wii-remote and IR to play this game. How did you find the aiming in Prime 3? Because it's been bettered by subsequent FPS since then.

I'm getting it, it looks good and Eurocom have put a lot of effort into it.

Also: The Goldeneye (Wii) Thread: Step back in time: For England, James

I have the Prime Trilogy and the controls were tough to get used to. But Retro did it really well and it became second nature later on.

As for Goldeneye, if I do pick it up I'll probably try both control schemes. My experience with shooters on the 360 migh benefit me with the classic controller, but playing with the Wii-mote might be the way to go since Goldeneye is exclusive to the Wii.

I wouldn't buy it even if I had a Wii. I've never cared for remakes much.

I was never a huge fan of GoldenEye back in the day. Back then I was playing Quake and PC FPS's which were better than GoldenEye. So I don't have any nostalgia driving interest in this game, nor do I really care about FPS's these days.

Goldeneye's single player was great and unique regardless of platform with the various objectives and stealth possibilities (without going to the realism side like something like Rainbow Six, which came later as well). Multiplayer was great also being local. And it certainly didn't look bad compared to the likes of Quake. N64 was at least neck and neck with PCs for quite a while. Although PC games did - as they still do - offer better controls.

i really not a big fps fan most of them feel all the same in the whole history of fps games i have played since the first doom and castle wolfenstine there has only been 5 i liked, i am debating if i want golden eye or black ops, i like how black ops has computer ai bots for offline multi-player i hate playing games with other humans, but i want to give golden eye a chance for the sake of it i guess i am undecided

eggmiester said:

i really not a big fps fan most of them feel all the same in the whole history of fps games i have played since the first doom and castle wolfenstine there has only been 5 i liked, i am debating if i want golden eye or black ops, i like how black ops has computer ai bots for offline multi-player i hate playing games with other humans, but i want to give golden eye a chance for the sake of it i guess i am undecided

I've been cold on the COD series since MW1, but I'm actually going to get Black Ops this year.  One, to spite the old Infinity Ward guys (and as we know spite is the best way to make game purchase decisions), but also just because I've liked what I've seen about it in the press.