Forum > Non-Gaming Discussion > Your useless fields of expertise
Your useless fields of expertise
<< prev
avatar
Country: EU
Comments: 9423
News Posts: 9625
Joined: 2008-06-21
 
Tue, 01 May 2012 17:44:03
bugsonglass said:

You make a very good point.  In fact many times I wished I had studied something which is very directly applicable and which gives one a very good idea of what jobs they should be looking for.  Instead I have degrees in Theoretical Physics and Pure Mathematics.  The only one more useless when it comes to helping you know what to do or giving you employment options would be Philosophy ... and I was actually very tempted to do that indecision

Yes, you can sit here crying about your past decision or you could man up and do something about it. Most of the difficult stuff in Engineering you already have mastered, you just have stuff like Control Theory that is hard. The rest is a lot easier and more fun. Since you are a all rounder do Mechanical Engineering, because it has the widest field of work.

There are two kinds of people on earth.

People that never got to be what they wanted to be...

and engineers.

The VG Press
avatar
Country: UN
Comments: 19004
News Posts: 9036
Joined: 2008-08-18
 
Thu, 03 May 2012 18:20:45

If it makes you feel any better Bugsy most of my listed areas of expertise were being very generous to myself. "Expert" is not something I'd apply to any area of knowledge that I have. On very few of those topics could I sit down and write a paper without any reference material. But I could hold my own in a bar room discussion.

And man, I should not try to communicate before my morning tea.

avatar
Country: EU
Comments: 9423
News Posts: 9625
Joined: 2008-06-21
 
Thu, 03 May 2012 19:42:20
aspro said:

On very few of those topics could I sit down and write a paper without any reference material. But I could hold my own in a bar room discussion.

Never in my life had I seen someone write a paper without reference materials. Also in the scientific paper world we all stand on the shoulders of giants. Unless you mean non-scientific papers, but those are worthless.

Edited: Thu, 03 May 2012 19:42:47
The VG Press
avatar
Country: UN
Comments: 19004
News Posts: 9036
Joined: 2008-08-18
 
Thu, 03 May 2012 19:50:59
Yeah I am talking non-scientific. I had to do that for history classes back in college. You go in, they give you a few sheets of paper, a topic and 90 minutes.

avatar
Country: EU
Comments: 9423
News Posts: 9625
Joined: 2008-06-21
 
Thu, 03 May 2012 19:55:29
aspro said:
Yeah I am talking non-scientific. I had to do that for history classes back in college. You go in, they give you a few sheets of paper, a topic and 90 minutes.

That is an essay. Even in historic papers you need reference various sources. The more you have the more plausible you become.

The VG Press
avatar
Country: UN
Comments: 16205
News Posts: 1043
Joined: 2008-06-21
 
Fri, 04 May 2012 02:44:21

An expert without references is an idiot, and quite often with references, is still an idiot, but that's beside the point.

avatar
Country: UN
Comments: 16205
News Posts: 1043
Joined: 2008-06-21
 
Fri, 04 May 2012 02:45:14

Except in the case of the reference-less above post, obviously.

<< prev
Log in or Register for free to comment
Recently Spotted:
*crickets*
Login @ The VG Press
Username:
Password:
Remember me?