angrymonkey said:

  

And uh if anyone that has a wii is getting silent hill for the ps2  because they don't care for the wii remote stuff then they don't have a wii. They really do just have 2 gamecubes duct taped together.

Aspro has a Wii, he's playing NMH2 now. But he hates motion controls.

phantom_leo said:

gamingeek said:

SteelAttack said:

Yes, butthurt. Like when I surprised you with my girthyness.

I wasn't butthurt, but then you said I was butthurt, which made me feel butthurt. Do you see?

Now Vader has to rub some of that lotion I put on his hairy cheek, onto my butt cheek. Prefferably using no hands.

Just a tip guys: Use the lotion BEFORE surprising anyone with the girthyness and you can avoid the butt-hurt altogether!

Take it from a pro!

Good tip.

SteelAttack said:

gamingeek said:

I just realised. "Take it from a pro"

I was talking about the "good tip" part.

Mine was unintentional but Leo's works on two levels.

Look at this

Ex-infinity ward guys are suing for $35 million and.... AND control of the COD franchise.

gamingeek said:

Look at this

Ex-infinity ward guys are suing for $35 million and.... AND control of the COD franchise.

edgecrusher said:

How is there cat porn out there that Leo hasn't posted yet?

angrymonkey said:

but I did not know there was a 'own a wii for new innovative games that don't take advantage of the innovative controls' .

It's a whole new demographic

gamingeek said:

aspro said:

^It's only just now coming out? I imported the PS2 copy when it came out.  Haven't popped it in yet, will be interesting to see how it stacks up against the Wii version.  I bought it for the innovative story stuff, not the wii-mote functions.

Dude the whole game was built around not only the wii remote features but also the hardware. If you check the comparison video, whole backgrounds and scenary are missing.

http://www.destructoid.com/silent-hill-shattered-memories-wii-vs-ps2-fight--161714.phtml

 I'll pop it in and let you know what it looks like.  My reasons to buy the PS2 version:

1. I am a collector as well as a gamer and the PS2 version will be rarer.  Games released for a system near the end of it's cycle always are.

2. The parts of the game described as being innovative are the multiple outcomes/ story paths based on the psuedo-psychological surveys throughout the game -- not the flashlight/ phone-ring aspects.

3. I'm not a graphics whore, and late cycle PS2 games look fine to me.

4. It was $20 less.  I can get another game for that.

phantom_leo said:

gamingeek said:

How is there cat porn out there that Leo hasn't posted yet?

QUIET MORTAL! Don't make me sic HIM on you!

aspro said:

(or whatever console it was cheaper on).

aspro said:

4. It was $20 less.  I can get another game for that.

Was it a bad harvest this year on the farm? You need to invest in rich, profitable bio fuel crops. Then reap in the cash like Activision and modern warfare!

aspro said:

.

2. The parts of the game described as being innovative are the multiple outcomes/ story paths based on the psuedo-psychological surveys throughout the game -- not the flashlight/ phone-ring aspects.

3. I'm not a graphics whore, and late cycle PS2 games look fine to me.

Does this LOOK like a late cyle PS2 game?

Anyhow, it wasn't just the psycho profile/outcomes that were described as innovative. In interviews all the devs talked about was how the made the whole game around the wii controls, using the flashlight and immersion that the wii remote brings, the motion, the phone aspects, the first person puzzling and flash light mechanic. They even developed per pixel lighting for when you sweep your torch over snowflakes.

You don't like motion but didn't you say that you really dug IR FPS controls and wanted more?