robio said:

Oh fuck what Emily Rogers has to say. I have no Mother 3. She said we would have Mother 3. And yet, no Mother 3. She is a dirty untrustworthy rumor monger.

I personally hope that everything she said turns out to be false, even if it's to the detriment of the NX.  I wish she would shut up.

The Wii had excellent first and third party games.

Holy shit Umbrella Chronicles  is one of the biggest pieces of shit I have ever played. First off the fucking menus don't work, it acts like a controller is constantly pushing to the side so you cant pick anything as its constantly changing every option. But in game it works fine.


In game is terrible, its a mess of a shooter where nothing feels good, melee is way too powerful, you cant see shit, maps are too small, objectives not clear. This is FUCKING SHIT. ORC felts way better than this crap.


Don't buy this.

Punk Rebel Ecks said:

The Wii had excellent first and third party games.

SupremeAC said:

edgecrusher said:

GameCube had more.

PS3 and 360 will have received more quality exclusives and third party games than both PS4 and Xbone.  What's your point?

So, is this the worst "generation" of gaming, or is it just me?:

This generation has been absolutely terrible in my opinion. As someone that doesn't like to play online, and isn't a fan of open world games with padding, filler and micro transactions I'm struggling to have much fun.


Technically consoles are the strongest they've been, and with release of even more powerful consoles on the horizon things have never looked so good technically. But in terms of actual fun, which is the reason I like to play games, then this generation has been absolute shit. Obviously this is my personal opinion (which I'm entitled to). I found the Super Nintendo, N64 and PS2 provided 100's more hours of fun and variety than this gen.


In terms of fun this gen it's been Nintendo that have provided the most enjoyment, pick up and play games where the actual gameplay is enjoyable, as opposed to forced online, open world games with micro management rpg systems and full of filler.


Honestly nowadays with most modern games if I take a short break from them, I almost need a refresher to remember what the hell I'm doing or where I'm supposed to go. I don't remember it ever being as bad on the N64, or even PS2.


Don't get me wrong, I can appreciate that there have been some really incredible games technically, and if you're someone that loves playing online, you've probably never been happier.


But for "offline" gamers wanting pick up and play games it's certainly not a good time to own a console.


So am I alone in thinking this? Anyone else think this gen is actually not that good? Or is it the greatest generation of gaming you've ever experienced?!

Another one.

I wonder if something like this could take of.  Surely a big part of the reason 3DTV failed was due to it requiring glasses.  On the other hand, if Nintendo could get a 3D image from any monitor through a cheap solution that could be included in the base hardware, that would give them a rather sweet edge over its competition, as it would open up 3D to the masses in the same way they did with the 3DS.

Realistically though, I doubt this is talking about 'true' 3D images, more likely it's the illusion of depth through manipulation of the camera based on the player's position relative to the monitor, as we've seen being pulled off way back in the early days of the Wii

gamingeek said:

Going by that image it still effectively nets you a 3D image and it looks really cheap to do. I guess it depends on how much the camera/sensor on top of the tv costs. Hopefully it is really cheap which means the cost wont impact on the specs of the actual machine. But it also looks like something very easily copied by other people, which is maybe why they have shrouded NX in mystery for so long. In Sonys case they already have a camera and move, all they need to do is stick a PS move globe on a plastic glasses frame or headband.

Yes.  Sony could implement this really easily with off the shelf parts:

Seriously though, if regular TV's were able to output some kind of 3D image that could be deciphered by actove or passive glasses, we would have seen a product like that a couple of years back.

SupremeAC said: