travo said:

I never played NMH2.  How different is it compared to the first?

It's much better, it cuts out the crudfest openworld, has levels selectable from a list, has better graphics, more cohesive, excellent retro minigame jobs. Unlike the first game you don't have to wade through mediocrity to get to the good bits. Although the bosses are less memorable. It's still a better game, by far.

edgecrusher said:

Look how many more replies the Wii thread got than the others....

NINTENDO FANBOYS!!!!! LOL

gamingeek said:

Well I can list 25 games just not all good ones. I havent played a lot of the games here though.

gamingeek said:

It's much better, it cuts out the crudfest openworld, has levels selectable from a list, has better graphics, more cohesive, excellent retro minigame jobs. Unlike the first game you don't have to wade through mediocrity to get to the good bits. Although the bosses are less memorable. It's still a better game, by far.

So basically you're saying they cut out all the bad parts, leaving only the boss battles, which are inferior to the original.    The original had some punk charm in that it did things its own way.  The second adhered more closely to what everyone feels a game should be like, but was a total mess.  How can it be more cohesive when it has a battle against a psychic cosmonaut in it?

SupremeAC said:

The original had some punk charm in that it did things its own way.

That's only good if those ways are good. A boring empty, butt ugly GTA facsimile is not good.