I'm calling out this IGN dude.
Anthony Gallegos, Editor:
The 3DS announcement was expected, but I am still a bit underwhelmed overall because we only got to see video of one game. I was led to believe the graphics would look way better than those of even the Wii from pre-E3 rumors, and while I can't say it looks bad, it certainly doesn't appear to be leaps and bounds beyond the DS.
Do I even need to comment on this? He says he was led to believe the graphics would look way better than even Wii? By who? By the very fucking website he works for. 
And then, please, not leaps beyond DS?
Next up is gamespot.
Randolph Ramsay, Editor | GameSpot AU
I'll have to reserve judgement until I get hands-on, but some of the Wii Sports-like controls worry me a little bit. But if anyone can make these types of motion controls work in an epic 15-hour-plus experience, it's Nintendo. Hopefully.
Not a huge criticism but what 15 hr Zelda game is this guy playing?
 |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The optimist proclaims we live in the best of all possible worlds while the pessimist fears this is true. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
Agnates said:He based his expectations on dumb rumous? Dumb person. And yeah MGS3 with better textures than the original release and running in 3D is totally not leaps and bounds above the DS' 3D capabilities, lolz.
If it was anyone else that didn't work for IGN I could understand the comment about it not being more powerful than Wii. But as this guy works for the very website that spread the PS3 power rumour he should at least call out Craig Harris for it. Something like "Craig fed us BS"
Not more powerful than DS though.... ugh