Missing the point so hard it hurts
I'm going to guess that aspro is not being sarcastic, and GG is
---
Tell me to get back to rewriting this site so it's not horrible on mobile---
Tell me to get back to rewriting this site so it's not horrible on mobileNow, now, Raven, it's only fair. Dude Raider! But if that guy is topless, then why isn't Lara?
Yodariquo said:I'm going to guess that aspro is not being sarcastic, and GG is
Correct for me at least. Sarcasm on the internet is not effective.
Log in or Register for free to comment
Recently Spotted:
*crickets*
Alright, so one of my favourite personalities in gaming is TotalBiscuit. I watched his casts of StarCraft II before I had even played the game and it brought me into it. He does opinion pieces in his weekly mailbag and tends to get involved in the online community more than he should, since that community is often terrible.
A recent Twitter exchange of his popped up on Reddit's /r/gaming subreddit, saying he was "telling it like it is"
/r/gaming took this in the wrong direction, so TB tried to clarify on /r/girlgamers, and oh boy did he ever miss the point.
We've had this discussion at length here, but it is frustrating from my end because it seems like a giant *whoosh* over the heads of everyone.
I would really, really like to know how he can post the former followed by the latter. The entire point is that the character design is part of the ingrained prejudice. I don't get why this is so hard to grasp.
Maybe I should try a different tact. Make things more relatable by making it a matter of sexism directed towards men.
There had been a trend through the late 90s and 2000s on TV to portray men in comedies as bumbling idiots. The lovable fool. Imagine this character foil in the majority of media. Kind of sucks doesn't it? It wouldn't mean whoever was making it meant to say that all men are idiots, but by continuing the pervasive trend, it becomes a harmful negative stereotype and affects people's perceptions. When you design female characters entirely for the consumption of male audiences, it creates a cultural bias of objectivity.
It's a matter of laziness if nothing else. When you get lazy with character design, you use archetypes. It just so happens the archetypes used for women are sexualized stereotypes. That's symptomatic of the aforementioned ingrained prejudice, and entirely why it's a problem.
---
Tell me to get back to rewriting this site so it's not horrible on mobile