I don't have a full article for this but I just wanted to elaborate on the baselessness of not just Dobbs but many cases lately. In essence, that the Supreme Court right-wingers are just making stuff up to reach a predefined conclusion, and the dissent called them out on it in the Dobbs case.

The American public,
they thought, should never conclude that its constitutional
protections hung by a thread—that a new majority, adhering to a new “doctrinal school,” could “by dint of numbers”
alone expunge their rights. Id., at 864. It is hard—no, it is
impossible—to conclude that anything else has happened
here. One of us once said that “[i]t is not often in the law
that so few have so quickly changed so much.” S. Breyer,
Breaking the Promise of Brown: The Resegregation of
America’s Schools 30 (2022). For all of us, in our time on
this Court, that has never been more true than today. In
overruling Roe and Casey, this Court betrays its guiding
principles.

The question of whether other rights are in jeopardy isn't one of jurisprudence or case law and whether there is a consistency of reasoning, because that isn't relevant to the majority's decisions. But outside of that, I'm wondering whether the judicial system can withstand it. It was already crumbling to a degree. Unqualified Trump judges were making ridiculous judgments counter to established law. Now established law is becoming incoherent. What then becomes of the lower courts? What about honest judges and prosecutors for whom the current Supreme Court is making a mockery?

Great blog post, very informative. I hope others are taking notice of your work.